home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!nibelung.demon.co.uk
- From: barry_s@nibelung.demon.co.uk (Barry Shilliday)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,demon.ip.support.amiga
- Subject: Re: How to optimise OS 2.04+ / speedups
- Date: 15 Apr 96 08:53:47 +0000
- Message-ID: <1161.6679T533T2364@nibelung.demon.co.uk>
- References: <19960415.7B1E470.7E9@asd03-10.dial.xs4all.nl>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: nibelung.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: nibelung.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
- On 15-Apr-96 00:15:22, Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
- >Commercial Break Time!
-
- >In article <1540.6678T87T2503@nibelung.demon.co.uk>
- >barry_s@nibelung.demon.co.uk (Barry Shilliday) writes:
-
- >> Put the following commands in your startup-sequence, after SetPatch. All
- >> of the programs can be found on aminet.
-
- >> Program Name Description Suggested Command Line
- >> ------------ ----------- ----------------------
- >>
- >> CpuBlit CPU does operations faster than CpuBlit >NIL: -b
- >> blitter.
- >>
- >> FBL Replaces some blitter functions FBL >NIL:
- >> with optimised code.
-
- >AFAIK these two replace roughly the same functions. But why not use MCP
- >instead? It offers this and many other patches, many more then one could
- >think of.
-
- <snip>
-
- A fan of MCP eh? ;)
-
- CpuBlit and Fbl both perform on the blitter but not the same functions.
- According to AIBB, when running both you get the best performance - oddly
- running CpuBlit before Fbl gives a slight improvement on the other way round.
-
- --
- 15-Apr-96 08:51:48
-
- Barry Shilliday -- <barry@nibelung.demon.co.uk>
- A1200/030/50/8+2/170 - KS 3.1
- Public PGP Key available on request.
-
-
-